Pune: BJP City President Dheeraj Ghate is embroiled in a controversy following allegations of electricity theft and unauthorized occupation of municipal property. Social activist Sagar Dhadave lodged a complaint claiming that Ghate has been operating an illegal office within a municipal corporation gym in Sane Guruji Nagar, Ambil Odha Colony, and has been using electricity without proper authorization since 2012.
According to the complaint, Ghate’s office was reportedly drawing electricity illegally, with direct connections powering air conditioners, treadmills, and other equipment. An inspection by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) on April 26, 2025, allegedly confirmed these claims. Despite the extended period of unauthorized electricity use, MSEDCL has imposed a relatively small fine of Rs. 95,000 for one year.
Advocate Asim Sarode has issued notices to the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC), MSEDCL, and Pune Police, urging strict action against Ghate. The complaint highlights concerns over inconsistent enforcement of laws, pointing out that ordinary citizens often face penalties for minor offenses such as delayed electricity payments or street vending, while Ghate, a municipal councilor, appears to have escaped stringent penalties. The activist has demanded that both Dheeraj Ghate and his wife, Manisha Ghate—also a municipal councillor—be booked under Section 135 of the Electricity Act for theft and that the unauthorized encroachment on municipal land be removed.
Responding to the allegations, Dheeraj Ghate stated, “The municipal corporation building houses a study center and gym used by municipal employees and their families. While local representatives can recommend projects, the authority to allocate or transfer usage of municipal properties lies solely with the municipal administration. With the upcoming PMC elections, political rivals are attempting to tarnish our reputation. Our institution was granted an 11-month contract to manage the building, and from the start of this contract, we have been responsible for the electricity bills. Issues concerning earlier electricity charges are matters for the relevant municipal officials to address.”
The case continues to draw attention as authorities review the allegations amid the political backdrop of the forthcoming municipal elections.
